“YOU WILL KNOW THEM, FOR THEY HATE ONE ANOTHER….”

That’s a 180-degree variation — in the form of an ultimate negation –of the ancient Scriptural passage telling us we will know Christians for they “love” one another.

Conversely, I say, you will know a Mafioso — unreconstructed or cooperating with authorities — because they hate one another. It must have something to do with the dark nature of their work. Obviously.

Boston Herald columnist Howie Carr noted in weekend editions that yesterday, June 9, was the 90th birthday of Stephen “The Rifleman” Flemmi who is serving a lengthy federal terms for murder, etc.. at an unspecified location in the nation. Wherever it is, it is far, far from his home of Boston. A true exile.

Carr quotes the late former Mafia capo Frank “Cadillac” Salemmi’s very hateful comments about Flemmi who was, after all, a close former business partner. He basically called him a crybaby. Others from that dark side of the tracks readily chime in when talking about Steve — and, of course, he has appeared in public rarely, and only to testify against former mob associates in an effort to lighten his own penal load. The last time was in 2018. This act, of course, is regarded as the ultimate violation of every criminal enterprise’s strict code of conduct (“ratting out” fellow members). But Steve is now on the ‘inside’ (of walls, chain link and concertina wire) looking ‘out’ (at nothing, including any prospect for freedom before the Angel of Death comes for him as he, an earthly ministering angel of murder, came for as many as fifty souls during his criminal career.) So –he probably cares little about what former associates think of him.

I wonder if he prays? I saw him, during one court apperance readily –and I dare say humbly — acknowledge his role in murders and even in the sexual exploitation of a stepdaughter. He seemed contrite — as much as any sociopath can be contrite, quietly admitting his “moral responsibility.” Does God hear the prayers of the spiritually and emotionally deformed who are genuinely sorry? Is he genuinely sorry? Even capable of genuine sorrow? God knows.

As a reporter, I once sat at a hearing in federal court in Boston in which Frank Salemmi, Steve Flemmi and Patriarca crime family soldier Bobby DeLuca sat side-by-side while a fellow Mafioso-turned-informant testified against them in a pre-trial hearing.

That informant was a strangely seemingly likeable character named Angelo “Sonny” Mecurio. In early images of him, he looks fierce, cold and hard — and overweight. In the dock, opposite his former compatriots, he seemed a paunchy, subued,even exhausted, strangely likeable old man with a wry turn of the eyes and lips. He could have been yours or my benign old uncle. He had gone so far in his effort to get leniency and break free of the mob as to wear a “wire” into a Mafia Induction Ceremony. Imagine the consequences if he’d been discovered! It was bad enough that, at the end of his criminal career, he’d been the one to lure Frank Salemmi to a mob meeting in Saugus at which there was an unsuccessful attempt on his life by fellow mobsters engaged with him in an underworld power struggle.

So, here were Flemmi and Salemmi, as I say, side-by-side — and already doubtless hating one another. Did they ever really like — or trust — one another? Is that possible in the Underworld?

Flemmi, like Mercurio, would go on, eventually, to testify against Salemmi, who, by the way, would in due course, loudly declare in open court that he was “done with the mob” only to be later implicated in the murder of a Boston nightclub owner and sent back to prison — along with Bobby DeLuca, who was forced to acknowedge his role in the same murder.

How did all these guys feel about one another? Mercurio gently upbraided one questioning attorney for referring to mob associates other than the ones sitting across from him, as “friends.”

“You keep call them ‘friends,'” Sonny complained. “At some point in time, they became EX-friends.” Subsequent to that, when asked by Federal Judge Mark Wolf if he liked the men across from him, Sonny said, “not really.” An understatement, no doubt. For some reason, Wolf decided to ask Sonny, “do you like me?”

“You’re alright,” Sonny said sheepishly.

Right answer — to a judge. But Judge Wolf was probably wondering if Mercurio, at this stage of his wayward life, liked anybody, much less loved them. Which gets to the point I’m making here about a defining mark of those who pledge their fealty, their very life to such darkness.

Did Sonny at least fear the men he’d worked among and was now betraying? At that question from somebody, Sonny shrugged and said, “look at the record. These are not Boy Scouts.”

One probing attorney asked him, “did it ever occur to you that you were acting as an agent of the government in this role as an informant (which is what Flemmi and late Irish Mob Boss James “Whitey” Bulger would offer as preposterous defenses for their efforts to undermine the Italian Mafia while carrying on their own criminal mischief. And it was Flemmi’s attorney, as I recall, who was asking the question.)

“Of course,” said Sonny. “I’m a stool pigeon.” When a barely supressed chuckling broke out across the sparsely populated courtroom, Sonny, in response, shrugged again. He seemed to be saying -wordlessly –that he was just calling a spade a spade. His candor almost seemed a form of contrition.

And, for that matter, entirely unrepentent-to-death James Whitey Bulger would never let anyone call him a “stool pigeon.” No, he insisted he was some new iteration of an Undergover Confidential Agent.

Yeah, right.

When that rationale collapsed as a defense strategy, he declared, “do with me what yooz want.”

And they did. They left him in prison far f rom home and were so careless about his incarceration — some would say deliberately so — that he became savagely and fatally naked to his hateful Mafia enemies.

Only God knows if James Bulger ever said anything like an Act of Contrition, though he insistently identified as a Catholic. Good thing God’s mercy is infinite.

Sonny Mercurio died in 2006, regretting — it was reported in his obituary — ever having taken on the role of mob informant, but resigned obviously to hating and being hated by his old crime cronies. Frank Salemmi, body scarred and punctured by the bullets of that assassination attempt (outside the Saugus, MA iHop), died in prison in 2022 at age 89. He, too, seemed resigned, at the time of sentencing to his imminent re-imprisonment; no it wouldn’t be his first tour of “the joint” and he had obviously lied when he said he was “done with the mob.”

He was, I believe, a family man, oddly enough, like a lot of these guys. But the mob came first. That was Frank’s family.

Bobby DeLuca, only 84 by my count and, so far as I know, still alive, had been serving a five-year sentence for lying about what he knew about the murder of that nightclub owner (who was, himself, a man who chose the wrong company in his life), but was released in 2022 on compassionate leave with a bad heart and kidney disease and, therefore, very susceptible (in the court’s eyes) to COVID.

All of which is to say…

Mobsters lead unhealthy lifestyles. Beyond fatty meats, pasta ,donuts, cigars and cigarettes, they also seem addicted to easy money, danger, and being feared and, ultimately, hated. Can you love hating people? We also know that it destroys the hater. So I believe. But that’s Christian psychology, currently being violated the world over.

Of course, much of what Mafiosos do to others and to one another is supposedly “strictly business” — or so the old trop goes. “Nothing personal.” Lethal amorality on steroids.

For the heck of it, I looked up an address in Boston’s Dorchester section (my old section) visible on early Flemmi crime records, and also visible as accompanying illustrations next to Howie Carr’s weekend column. It was Steve Flemmi’s address as of August, 1958 when he was just 24. I looked at the front porch. Someone had hung a rug over a second floor porch. No one’s going to put up a plaque by the chain link fence and llittle yard of shrubbery in Steve Flemmi’s honor. No one living there now, I’m sure, has any idea that, decades ago, a stone-cold murderer and mobster was being nurtered in that house along that quiet street off Washington Street. He was a Korean War veteran whose military MOS (Military Occupation Specialty) had been “Rifleman,” meaning a rifle-bearing member of a combat unit. From the time of his discharge, he entered into a life of crime. I heard him say so in court. Who knows why (Again, God knows.)

I don’t know if it was his long-ago criminal associates, impressed by the combat veteran in their midst, or Flemmi himself who decided to recycle and adopt his military specialty as the odious street nickname, “rifleman.” Reporters love to say it. It sounds so evil and so Godfather, so Sopranos. The glamour of evil.

But millions of American male soldiers and Marines, now and in times past, have borne that title through a time of war. Steve “The Rifleman” Flemmi decided to dishonorably deploy it, turn it on its head and keep it forever — wherever he is now.

How intimidating! (Once upon a time.)

How– hateful! (Now and forever.)

WITHER WE U.S. BOOMERS, AS JUNE DOTH ONCE AGAIN BLOOM ?

When we hit 35, we posessed 21% of the nation’s wealth. Millenials nearing that average age possess just 3% of the nation’s household wealth.

So says a fascinating volume noted below that broke upon the scene almost three years ago.

It has been alleged in various quarters that our bid for personal freedom ended up destroying the institutions and restraints that made freedom safe and possible.

The book containing those charges is Boomers: The Men and Women who Promised Freedom and Delivered Disaster. (Sentinel, 2021)

I’ve only scratched the surface and so cannot make a good case for or against Andrews’s dire thesis. But, being a Boomer, I’m certainly interested in exploring her less than throroughly rosie exploration of the civilizational contributions — or desecrations — of Steve Jobs, Aaron Sorkin, Heffrey Sachs, Sonia Sotomayor — Boomers all, and all, among others, scrutinized in this book . And, of course, of millions of others (including, as I’ve indicated, myself), will have to examine our own consciences and our sense of our own contributions or divigations.

To mention just one person:

Camille Paglia has always interested me, a flashy Boomer contrarian. I don’t hear much about her lately.

But I agree with those who admire her for resenting the over-elevation of pop culture and the denegration of academia — and, with critic/observer Michael Brendon Dougherty’s mordent aside about “the naivete’ of a generation that thought the worst effects of free love could be handled tidily by penicillin.”

But Dougherty concedes, “If Boomers are going to die with nearloy three-fifths of our nation’s wealth (which apparently Andrews’s book maintains), “we had better find a way to be written into their last wills.”

I’m one Boomer who doesn’t expect to reap that bonanza. So I know no one will be interested in finding their way into my will.

Not a post-Boomer soul.

NIKKI HALEY

I usually avoid politics in these politically hyperventilating times. . But a recent tortured political enterprise, now ended, has provoked me into the arena. I’ll say my piece, then slip back into the shadows.

I speak of Nikki Haley’s quixotice candidacy.

Nikki probably never really had a chance, and ultimately probably did nothing more than douse a certain portion of the American electorate with purple dye so Democrats know where to hunt for wobbling, disgruntled voters to rescue their senescent blowhard placeholder from the morgue reserved for one-term losers.

At the outset, when it seemed she just might have a shot at the White House, she endured the predictable, execrable slanders from the Left, beginning with the dreadful , narcissistic Don Lemon, formerly of CNN, who dismissed her as a woman NOT in her prime.

The so-called Progressive Left has no shame. Theirs and the Democratic Party’s appalling influence from Washington to Hollywood is probably why Republicans wound up with the convex carnival mirror opposite with the likes of Marjory Taylor Green and Lauren Boebert who, as one pundit has commented, appear to mistake regular appearances on cable news and social media taunting thier opponents –wearing MAGA hats — with the business of governing. Indeed Green famously suggested we split up as a nation with “a national divorce from the Left.”

But, back to the demise of Nikki Haley….and the Left’s abuse of her.

Recall how Donald Trump was (rightly) attacked for engaging in “birtherism” during the presidency of Barrack Obama. The hypocritical Left did the same with Nikki Haley over her Indian heritage, suggesting there should be a search of South Carolina probate records to see just who and what she is. MSNBC’s Mehdi Hasan declared that Haley, former U.N. Ambassador and South Carolina governor, should not be understood as a positive example of how successfully minorities can advance in the United States because she “uses her brown skin to launder white-supremacist talking points.”

I guess she wasn’t black or brown enough for them. It’s the old Clarence Thomas exceptionalism.

And they asked about her name (as Barrack Obama was quizzed about his name). Mary Trump, a favorite of the Left for her regular excoriation of her uncle Donald, tweeted, “First of all, f*** you Nimrata Haley.

(Yes, these are dreadful times. Perhaps I should refrain from such harsh words for the President. It’s just that I loath his obvious and toxic and manifest phoniness and his rosary-bead-rattling Whited Sepulchre Catholicism while he actively, aggressively attacks the pro-life moment at every turn, pledging now to negate the hard-won, generational victory of that movement by reimposting the legally insupportable national abortion license known as Roe V. Wade rather than let the people decide where and how much they wish to be pro-abortion. Fear not, those of you who support abortion rights. You’ll be winning in the long-short term. But the other side deserves some bargaining power. I fear you fear our national conscience will be awakened to this horror and it will cease. That, my friend, is a long way off.)

Nikki Haley ultimately probably hoped to be the face of traditional institutional Republicanism and traditional conservatism in the post-Trump era. –a noble aspirtaion, but I fear that ship has sailed. And it didn’t help that she indulged in her own form of identity politics, speaking of how her family, “wasn’t white enough to be white, weren’t black enough to be black.” Enough already! Let us finally usher in a truly post-racialist era.

So, she fought on, resisting Trump’s pressure to withdraw. I have to admire her for that, up to a point. But it was a rolling example of futility that, again, just let the Democrats know where the reluctant Democrats and renegate, non-MEGA Republicans might be lurking.

I don’t know if she’ll ever be back or might, more likely, drift into political oblivion. She never, ever truly cut a very strong or forceful figure –no fault of hers. A University of New Hampshire poll at the outset of her candidacy had her only at 8 per cent. This improved as time marched on and other challengers dropped out. But not by much.

Nice try, Nikki. You just weren’t what we were looking and praying for.

Now, pray with us that we somehow survive the coming four-year hell that the purgatory of bad choices has left in your wake.

THE GREAT SCATTERING

Why, oh why this bizarre reign of what we’ve come to call “identity politics”?

Damned if I know, if, that is, I confine my thoughts to those thoughts I can just peel off the top of my agitated head. Go deeper, like one diving with full oxygen into a murky lagoon, and –why, there you find a tangled subaqueous plethora of reasons why a reasonable race of bipods such as we are should find ourselves so messed up.

I’m helped –after being launched upon — this deep dive by writer Mary Eberstadt whose 2019 book Primal Screams (plural) explores our penchant for dividing along racial lines and other related common contemporary phenomena such as the insane excesses of modern political correctness, frequent compus demonstrations over every perceived injustice and what has been called the “cancel culture” in which, at the whim of some influencer, you or I can be discredited and banished from public discourse. Throw in radical feminism, gender-bending ideology, the excesses of the Me Too movement and all manner of unhinged activism.

I confess that Eberstadt’s book is on a heap of unread books on my library wish list. I just happened to stumble upon an old review. Therefore, I’ve read excerpts in that review that assure me the author’s analysis is free of rancor or any diatribe against “cultural Marxism.” It feels like a good book for the times.

She maintians our current state of affairs is not all about “power” — a charge I often level against the activists. She claims all such contemporary social-justice rebellions, now so tiresome to so many of us, amount to a “survival strategy” for the alienated. (Come to think of it, I, too, in my vigorous push-back against it all might also be engaging in such a strategy. I’m feeling alienated, too.)

“Such phenomena are indeed bizarre,” she writes, “if we examine them with the instruments of Aristotelian logic. But if instead we understand them against the existential reality of today –one in which the human family has imploded, and in which many people, no matter how privileged otherwise, have been deprived of the most elementary human connections –we can grasp in full why identity politics is the headline that just won’t go away.”

Eberstadt calls this process “the Great Scattering.” Because so many people below a certain age no longer enjoy a traditional family. They are, indeed, scattered.

Her first salient point: there has been a breakdown of family and familial bonds — our “natural habitat.” What is the connection between blood and personal identity? Haven’t we all become disoriented in search of intimacy — and personal identity? The human animal is now a flock of sheep without a shepherd. We now place more emphasis than did our ancestors on voluntary associations rather than on our once far more solid family environment. Feel free to challenge all these assertions. By themselves, they can feel gratuitious.

That’s why we should read books not reviews. But Eberstadt’s conclusions were there for me to ponder, such as that a healthy sense of self, and our moral maturation, among other essential developmental stages, have not only been delayed; they have, in many cases, been entirely stunted in the individual. I encounter a fair number of colleg-age students who seem to be crying out for protection from, rather than exposure to life.

So, we must ask, who are we? Who are people who will protect us? What is our “family”?

Eberstadt goes further, and here no doubt she rankles modern sensibilities with a thesis that is truly politically incorrect: she blames the sexual revolution for the advent of identity politics.

How? Why?

Well, ask yourself what has been the impact of the sexual revolution on marriage, family life, romance as reflected in everything from modern anthropology to popular culture? She does not write or speak here in religious terms. This is not an evangelical screed. Not, at least, so far as I can tell from the aggregate of quoted passages, though I know Mary Eberstadt to be Christian religious and so her thinking on all matters will doubtless reflect that, however subtly.

Nonetheless, consider how the pervasive use of artificial contraception, so essential, as is abortion, to the sexual revolution, has released us from consequences, led to mutual objectification between the sexes. A popular series such as “Sex in the City” reflects that, not without an entertaining level of self-analysis. I only chanced to watch one episode in which one comically sex-obessed female character blurts out, “I hate religion. It f**ks up your sex life.”

And nowadays, one wonders if it isn’t only the religious — and specifically the Catholic religious — who abstain from the dartificial regulation of birth. And far from all of them, or even, maybe, most of them. I guess that’s what’s called Modern Love.

But….

Biology once pushed us toward marriage and family life, even if it was a less than perfect family life. Traditional sexual mores imposed restraints. And we have viewed the casting off of those restraints as liberating. We were free! But — free of what? And for what? Chronic anxiety, crushing loneliness — at least in some cases. Or so Eberstadt believes, as do I. I see it in Generations X, Y and Z –and, to some extention, in us Baby Boomers who first cast off the yoke of convention in the 60s.

We’ve come to place a high priority on individual freedom and autonomy over against the maintaining of the integrity of the traditonal family in an ordered social whole.

And (laughing) I say, Yow!!…

I’ve suddenly begun to think of those Progressive Insurance TV commercials — so funny I make a point of watching them — dramatizing mock classes in which youngish people are instructed how not to turn into their parents. Yes, very funny. Of course, those amounts to only gentle raillery against superficial life habits –and, of course, insurance-buying practices — of superanuated adults; not to those deeper, more serious ways in which we might profitably emulate those who nurtured and raised us.

But I’ll challenge my own thesis here — and wonder if it isn’t, in our modern world, far more appropriate for children to explore their own talents and interests, search on their own terms for a spouse and occupation and a social situation suitable to them personally.

I’ll also ask if that can lead to true human flourishing unlinked from deep families ties and identities.

As for the impact on personal identities, destinies, attitudes and human outcomes of the sexual revolution — I know the Genie is not going back in the bottle. But I will always maintain that this particular revolt against our biology and ( I believe) human emotional reality has set us on a dark, unknown moral and spiritual path that may one day erupt in an entirely unforseen counter-revolution short of a reversion to Puritanism. The Genie will climb voluntarily back in the bottle. The so-called hook-up cultural, among other negative outcomes, unquestionably led to the course correction of the Me Too movement.

Perhaps human intimate and familial relations will ever hence exist suspended in a kind of utilitarian, humanistic malaise altered only by these new non-family, racial associations and identities –until the end of time.

Whatever.

Meanwhiile, you might want to explore these question, no matter where you fall on the political spectrum. You might even want to read this book, even if you disagree with its conclusions — just for the vital questions it raises.

I DROPPED THE BALL ON THE ‘BALL DROP.’ WE ROLL INTO JANUARY

No, I never said much about the passage into yet another new year. Hopes and fears and all that — or anything about the old year. Old years are old, that’s all I’ll say about that.

I just remember the little dog quivered and trembled as July 4th fireworks exploded outside the home in Rotterdam Junction where I went to escape the Florida heat for that hot month. I wanted to be on the lawn watching them and hearing them, in the distant sky and the lawn across the street — concussions and flaring, hissing spectacles, great and small. But I was inside, consoling a dog — the same dog who looked so unhappy and distressed at the thud, whistle, crash and boom of New Year’s Eve incendiaries all around us as midnight crept up and over the fence like time’s predator. The dog might have thought, ‘save me from that beast!’ Or, ‘existential man, making needless noises. No wonder there are wars.’

And what more can be said of new beginnings for those of us who are never finishing what we begin?

Somehow, I remember the guy who came into The Last Mile Lounge on January 2nd, 2017. That already seems like a long time ago. (It is, after all, already a mystical seven years ago.) Oddly enough, this guy was r emembering stuff from back in 2012. Crazy, he, too, was wondering, where’s the time go? Then, he was launched on a riff about time — and eternity.

A New Year. Time Square delirium already days gone. All the confetti swept up. But, in his mind, the observances continued.

And this guy in the shadowy corner of the lounge was saying to a few people at another table — all of them strangers who’d “dropped in” for a beer and a “ball.” Speaking of balls.

And then there was this guy. He seemed a seer; seemed to sense that life sweeps us down river. And he was speaking haikus, from what I could hear (I’d just dropped in, too. The bartender’s name was Cynthia; she works Thursdays and Fridays, still. Therefore this must have been a Thursday or Friday. She could hear the guy; everybody could.)

The seer at the back table said:

“We’re bug on a leaf, floating down stream. Singing.”

Wher had I heard that?

He said:

“I will arise now, and go to Innesfree…”

I knew where I’d heard that. Or read it. Or heard it, ‘in the deep heart’s core.’

He said:

“You shall tread upon the asp and the viper; you shall trample down the lion and the dragon.”

Everybody was listening now. Crazy. But where had we heard that? Snakes, dragons, lions.

He stood now. We were all listening, worried. Would we need to call the cops?

He said:

“Shall he who shaped the ear not hear, or he who formed the eye not see? The Lord knows the thoughts of men and that they are vain.”

Then he said:

“Happy New Year!”

Then he sat. He was drinking ice water. He never said another word.

A cold rain was falling outside.

Yeah, happy new year….

GAZA

The sin at our origin. The Lord of Filth.

Satan, which means enemy, Apollyon

Which means Exterminator

Beelzebug, which means Lord

of Flies or Beelzebul, which means

Lord of Filth

The rest are an evil anonymous

multitude.

Pre-conscious terrors.

Demons. Meanwhile,

Leaflets shower d own. Leave, abandon your home

Run

Though you may be killed on y our way.

Fortunes of War.

War is the suspension of all

Fortunes.

Hamas. Lords of Filth

In Arabic, it looks like this:

 حركة المقاومة الإسلامي

Which translates, Resistance

Or some such meaningless thing.

Right.

Lies.

Meanwhile,

We’re coming, we will scour hot rubble.

We’ll find you.

But find me an end to this.

Find the baby killers.

But find me an end to this.

An end.

The End.

But…

World’s over for a while.

Maybe forever. War Without End

Which is the Middle East, Beelzebul’s

Playground. Cradle of Civilization.

Land where it all began.

Where there is war with out end.

War always feels like the end. It never ends.

Savegery.

Maybe civilization, and the world’s

Proud self-sufficient hopes, died with the first war

The first hurled prehistorica rock. Somewhere

Maybe Times Square

But, for now…

Words. Talk. Useless

Somewhere some guy I know

Is probably sitting on the world’s toilet,

reading his iPhone, seeing the news and saying, blithely,

“This too shall pass.”

As if history were a bowel movement.

Because who can excrete

or defecate reality?

Who can ever pass that load?

The Filth in the bowl this time is called

Hamas.

__________________

Wilfred Owen, January 19, 1917, writes his mother that “No Man’s Land is pockmarked like a body of foulest disease and its odour is the breath of cancer…No Man’s Land under snow is like the face of the moon, chaotic, cratere-ridden, uninhabitable, awful, the abode of madness.

Wilfred Owen, soldier and poet, was killed in action, trying to get his men across the Sambre Canal, November 4, 1918, a week before the Armistice.

Now, tell me what that was all about?

______________________________________________

This time…

No Man’s Land is orange Gaza dust, close by the Holy Land and The Wailing Wall, where the promises of deliverance began

where the young raved

Til dawn, and the devil on scooters, came, rudely ended the party and Sara and Ira were hunted

Like animals. By animals.

On barren orange dust “like the face of the moon.”

Hunted like animals.

All sin involves following one’s own desire

And then comes The Lord of Filth

To Gaza.

__________________________________

“The bitch that bore him is in heat again.” -Brecht, of Hitler.

Gaza.

Gaza

Gaza

The Lord of Filth walks in Gaza.

EARTHLY IMMORTALITY

British novelist and columnist Lionel Shriver (she’s a woman), writing vividly in the July 10, 2023 National Review about the modern quest for immortality, reminds us that there’s a difference between wanting to feel young — to have energy, to be free from pain and impairment, an ambition with which most of us would be sympathetic — and wanting to look young.

She claims that 46-year-old Tech tycoon Bryan Johnson boasts that he has the lung capacity of an 18-year-old and the skin of a man age 28. Shriver also claims he employs thirty doctors for his Project Blueprint to remain personally youthful, while getting regular transfusion of his 17-year-old son’s blood. His regime also incudes microdoses of Botox and the injection of salman-sperm DNA around the eyes. (Apparently, the son doesn’t mind the transfusions but, Shriver opines and many would agree, this seems an entirely vampirish practice.)

Shriver has obviously been thinking about the youth craze for some time. “For the Silicon Valley set, as for their neighbors in Hollywood,” she write, “appearance seems to be paramount. Especially for people so wealthy that money is meaningless, youthfulness is the preferred currency.”

She admits she, too, is vain. (and I’m also a charter member of that Vain #MeToo Movement.) But, she adds, “It’s just that a smoother complexion in middle age…is hardly one giant leap for mankind.”

Most of her essay deals fascinatingly and in considerable depth with the strikingly large tech industry working to cancel death and allow us to live forever — about which she concludes, “the vision of a species that has calcified into the same individuals forever, with no renewal, no turnover, no children, is ghastly.”

And that’s not half of the ghastliness.

AIN’T IT A SHAME?

In November, 2021, all kinds of negatative cultura/political “stuff” was coursing through our nation’s bloodstream with blinding speed, rivaling the ravages being inflicted on us by the pandemic. It was about the same time Arizona Senator Krysten Sinema was under prolonged attack by fellow Democrats for holding out on key tax, health and climate legislation.

In that November period, the reliably insightful Kevin D. Williamson of the National Review suggested that the countercultural Left, like the Marxist-Leninist Left before it, was Dionysian in character, given to public theater like Occupy Wall Street and even following their political enemies into the toilet, as they had recently done to Senator Sinema.

“The essence of totalitarianism,” wrote Williamson, “is the abolition of private life and privacy. “

Now, Senator Sinema is an Indpendent. And I understand a third of voters in once-reliably Republican Arizona are registered as Indpendent.

But Elvia Diaz, writing for the Arizona Republic, levied a decidedly negative and cynical assessment of Sinema’s Party shift a year after Williamson noted her persecution at the hands of the Leftists. Diaz wrote in December, 2022, “She’s ditching the Democratic Party because she either figured she can’t win a primary or she no longer needs the party’s money and infrastructure for her next move – or both.

“Her trajectory suggests she’s adept at ditching anyone or anything no longer useful to her. She began her public life as a Green Party activist. That went nowhere so she became an independent, which didn’t work, either. Her big break came after she conveniently became a Democrat.”

Maybe so.

Sinema wouldn’t be the first politician to shed seeminglyi bedrock ideological affiliation and drift among Parties looking for a softer resting place for their self-centered political aspirations. Consider Joe Biden, the “moderate.” Don’t make me laugh. Donald Trump, loyal Republican. Yeah, right.

But can we deny Sinema’s assessment that “pressures in both parties pull leaders to the edges – allowing the loudest, most extreme voices to determine their respective parties’ priorities, and expecting the rest of us to fall in line.”

Isn’t that where we find ourselves in August, 2023?

Ain’t it a shame?

THE F.B.I.

As multiple political and law enforcement embroglios engulf us, I’m going to indulge, very briefly, my fears and mixed feelings about the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The Bureau’s credibility has unquestionably been compromised by the domestic security missions it has undertaken. It has come to light, for instance, that agents were infiltrating and investigating Catholic Latin Mass-goers as potential terrorists. On what evidence did they undertake such a thing?

It remains, as far as we know, a bureacracy still capable of remarkable achievements in the area of criminal investigation. Of that I feel certain.

But it has been assigned contradictory missions. This has generated problems. It has revealed incompetence, malfeasance and political bias in its ranks. This has hurt its reputation. We know supervisors tapped into partisan sources in their investigation into Donald Trump’s alleged Russia ties, such as uncorroborated Hillary Clinton campaign opposition research. Prior to that, by contrast,agents had cleared Mrs. Clinton of any wrongdoing in her email scandal despite finding that she had recklessly mishandled classified information and destroyed government records. It’s true, the investigation tarnished her image. She lost the election — and blamed the F.B.I. She might be right. But, here again, should such investigations be in the perview of the F.B.I.?

You might ask – who else should handle them? Well, frankly, I don’t know. But where the target of the investigation is an elected official, trouble in the form of political bias seems to ensue. Is it impossible to de-politicize the Justice Department? One would hope so.

Meanwhile, can we have any faith the Bureau is doing any better handling the multifaceted Trump investigation into, among other things, mishandled classified files? You can be certain Trump supporters don’t think so.

An agency like the F.B.I. lives by its reputation and credibility. It is just one of the federal agencies many Americans have ceased to trust.

That’s a problem for all of us.